Drawing for URITEC

USPTO serial 74164487

URITEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URITEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward R. Gates

EDWARD R GATES WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACK, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005biological reagents and test kits comprised essentially of reagent-coated test strips or human urines as controls, for testing urine samples, and in particular determining therapy compliance in connection with treatments relating to mycobacterial infection and/or diseaseABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 23, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance