Drawing for Serial No. 74164601

USPTO serial 74164601

Serial No. 74164601

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIRMAN, DONNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74164601?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Tally Eitan

A TALLY EITAN SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSON, ET ALSTE 70025 METRO DRSAN JOSE, CA 95110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029frozen processed meat, fish, poultry and vegetablesABANDONED—
030steamed or fried dumplings filled with fish, meat or vegetables (chinese "dim sum") and noodlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 15, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 15, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 4, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 27, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 26, 1993ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 22, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 22, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance