USPTO serial 74164652
MALVY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1993
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MALVY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
94500 Champigny Sur Marne, FR
94500 Champigny Sur Marne, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virgil H. Marsh
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER, CHRISTEN & SABOLSTE 5902000 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal locks and keys therefor, metal safes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | theft alarms and electronic burglar alarms for trailers, houses, apartments and various rooms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | automobiles, theft alarms and electronic burglar alarms for automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 15, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |