USPTO serial 74164731
SEGRO AMERICA SEGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEGRO AMERICA SEGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
7150 AA Eibergen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY DALTON BARIL
MARY DALTON BARIL MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE AND BOOTHEONE JAMES CTRRICHMOND, VA 23219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | abrasive cutoff machines and parts; namely, grinding wheels, coated abrasives, diamond wheels and synthetic diamond wheels, carbide burrs, metal cutting blades and saws | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |