USPTO serial 74165121
MAXIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
20089 Quinto Stampi - Rozzano (Milano), IT
20089 Quinto Stampi - Rozzano (Milano), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Patch
ROBERT J PATCH YOUNG & THOMPSON745 S 23RD STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | tennis rackets, squash rackets, badminton rackets, tennis balls, squash balls, badminton birdies, and replacement strings for the aforementioned rackets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1993 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |