USPTO serial 74165136
AMAZING STORIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMAZING STORIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay S. Kenoff
JAY S KENOFFSTE 12501999 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of reality-based television programs; production and distribution of motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arbus, Loreen
- Other trademarks owned by Arbus, Loreen
- Other trademarks owned by Ross, Helaine
- Other trademarks owned by Ross, Helaine
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AMAZING STORIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |