Drawing for MBNA'S DELAWARE SERIES

USPTO serial 74165515

MBNA'S DELAWARE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MBNA'S DELAWARE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randel S. Springer

RANDEL S SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCONE W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036banking services, namely credit card services, certificate of deposit services, money market funds, and line of credit servicesACTIVEMay 5, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 1, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 29, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 21, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 26, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1992PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 8, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance