Drawing for CACHET

USPTO serial 74165529

CACHET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CACHET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Artz Ash, Esq.

Karen Artz Ash, Esq. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011residential lampsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance