Drawing for PUTTING WAND

USPTO serial 74165578

PUTTING WAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUTTING WAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Greenlee

DAVID A GREENLEEP O BOX 4516TROY, MI 48099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028golf club accessories; namely, stroke practice aidsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 30, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 30, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 15, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 24, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 20, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 19, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 8, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance