USPTO serial 74166689
LANVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1766590Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 1993
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Muskal
JAMES B MUSKAL LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYERSTE 4900TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601-6780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in the field of computer networking | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTICAL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTICAL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTICAL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LANVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1995 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1991 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |