USPTO serial 74166974
PC LEARNING LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PC LEARNING LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Brambilla
DANIEL D BRAMBILLA PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELLSOHN1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing facilities and equipment in connection with tests of training materials in the field of computers and information services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | design and development for others of tests of training materials in the field of computers and information services; organizing and conducting educational testing of training materials in the field of computers and information services, and analysis and consulting relating thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |