USPTO serial 74167227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLERSTE 5222361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper goods; namely, notes pads, notebooks and file folders; English and foreign language training books; brochures in the field of foreign language translation in English, French, Chinese and Arabic; foreign language textbooks; pedagogic teaching materials in the form of printed word games | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | board games and toys; namely, hand-held units for playing electronic games or computer game equipment containing memory devices; namely, disks | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | business consultation and personnel placement and recruitment services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting classes in the fields of vocational, linguistic and translation training and correspondence; and videotape production | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | recruitment of translators and linguists | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |