USPTO serial 74168660
ORINOTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORINOTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miles J. Tralins
ISABEL VALS COLLERANSONE BISCAYNE TWR STE 33102 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | bitumen-in-water emulsion for use in the manufacture of liquid fuel | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | liquid base load fuel for the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | computerized database management for the energy sector, conducting marketing studies in the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | storage of a liquid base load fuel for others in the energy sector, transportation by shipping for the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | technical consultation and research in the energy sector, and computer services; namely, leasing access time to computer databases in the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES, ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES, ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORINOTAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 1993 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |