USPTO serial 74169026
ENVIROSPRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIROSPRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1R9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia C. Weber
KIRBY MANUFACTURING CORP5751 COOPERS AVEMISSISSAUGA, ON L4V 1R9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | household cleaning products; namely, all purpose cleanser, window cleaner, toilet bowl cleaner, laundry detergent, dishwasher detergent, fabric softerner, laundry starch, and stain remover | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |