Drawing for HEAT WAVE

USPTO serial 74169619

HEAT WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEAT WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry A. Schulman

JERRY A SCHULMANTER EXECUTIVE CTR COURT C1 S 376 SUMMIT AVEOAKBROOK TERRACE, IL 60181

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011hand-held electric hair dryersABANDONEDFeb 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 1996ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 1, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance