Drawing for IT'S A DOLLAR

USPTO serial 74170058

IT'S A DOLLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S A DOLLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren A. Sklar

WARREN A SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR19TH FL1621 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail variety store servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 2, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 14, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 14, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance