USPTO serial 74170420
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann C. Kirwin
ANN C KIRWIN IRELAND, STAPLETON, PRYOR & PASCOE, PC1675 BROADWAY STE 2600P O BOX 1410DENVER, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer network systems consisting of computer hardware and computer software in the field of computer aided design and color graphics | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |