USPTO serial 74171408
THE ICE CREAM BAKERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ICE CREAM BAKERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L. BAKER
575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ice cream, frozen yogurt, Italian ice, sherbet, ice cream cones, sundaes, milk shakes, banana splits, ice cream cups, ice cream cake and ice cream sandwiches for consumption on or off the premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |