USPTO serial 74171504
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oregon Research and Development Corporation
Salem, OR
Other trademarks owned by Oregon Research and Development Corporation
Oregon Research and Development Corporation
Salem, OR
Other trademarks owned by Oregon Research and Development Corporation
CLEVELAND, OH
Oregon Research and Development Corporation
Salem, OR
Other trademarks owned by Oregon Research and Development Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A SEBOLT
COLLEEN F GOSS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEESEVENTH FL1100 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | elastomeric rubber roof coating | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 6, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |