Drawing for CHICAGO COSMETOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION

USPTO serial 74171695

CHICAGO COSMETOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICAGO COSMETOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK J. COYNE

PATRICK J COYNE COLLIER, SHANNON, RILL & SCOTT3050 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042association services; namely, promoting the interests of members of the cosmetology professionABANDONEDJul 16, 1971

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance