USPTO serial 74171952
PANINO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - MAIL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANINO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Martin
TIMOTHY J MARTINSTE 62044 UNION BLVDLAKEWOOD, CO 80228Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services featuring prepared sandwiches, soups, salads, pizzas and pastas | ACTIVE | Sep 19, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |