USPTO serial 74172539
CMEVIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1840131Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 1994
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CMEVIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L. DEVER
MICHAEL L DEVER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL, PCONE OXFORD CTR301 GRANT ST 20TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ VIDETAPES ] * VIDEOTAPES * OF MEDICAL INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CME INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CME Conference Video, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CME Conference Video, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CMEVIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2005 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 18, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |