USPTO serial 74172709
ELLE-BELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRANZELLE, JUDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELLE-BELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DK-3460 Birkerod, DK
DK-3460 Birkerod, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur H. Seidel
ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin soap, body lotions, body creams, essential oils for personal use, dentifrices, shampoo, hair lotions, and cosmetics; namely, lipstick, powder, rouge, mascara, nail polish, fluid make-up and make-up pencils | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |