USPTO serial 74172792
"SENIOR RX"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "SENIOR RX"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Miller
MARK D MILLER KIMBLE, MACMICHAEL & UPTON, PCSTE 221 FIG GARDEN FINANCIAL CTR5260 N PALM AVE P O BOX 9489FRESNO, CA 93792-9489Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | pharmacy program for senior citizens which will provide subscribers with products from walk-in and/or mail-order pharmacies at reduced costs and filling charges | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1992 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 10, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |