USPTO serial 74173259
VAC-U-GLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAC-U-GLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal West, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | thermally efficient insulated glass, glass panes and glass panels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |