USPTO serial 74174027
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
27508 Voghera (PV), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward B. Gregg
EDWARD B GREGG FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ET ALSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | crank arm actuators for the automation of small size valves including double acting and spring return types, scotch yoke actuators for the automation of medium and large-size valves including double-acting and spring return types, gas-over-oil actuators including control cabinet and hand station and operable by gas carried in the pipeline, hydraulic high pressure actuators operated by hydraulic transmission oil or by high pressure water, hydraulic actuators with control cabinets including pressure intensifier, pneumatic positioner and proportional/integral regulator for throttling large size ball valves to regulate down stream pressure in a forty inch pipeline, the power being supplied by gas carried in the pipeline, gas-over-oil linear actuators for the automation of large gate valves fitted with detents in order to hold the slab in open position, pneumatic linear actuators for the automation of small and medium gate and globe valves fitted with manual hand wheel for emergency operation; and accessories; namely, pneumatic/hydraulic pressure intensifiers used for automation of large valves when the pressure supply is very low, differential pressure detectors used in fail/safe or emergency shut down circuits and as line-break detectors, twin 3/2 solenoid valve manifolds mounted, fitted with levers for manual operation, air receivers manufactured to ASME Standards, complete with relief valve and accessories, electro-hydraulic central power units complete with pushbutton station and bladder type accumulator, micro-switch box with an explosion proof enclosure suitable for sub-sea surface down to four hundred meters, hand-station for manual operation consisting of a hand-pump, a spring centered directional valve, oil sump, flow control valves and automatic override, all manifold mounted | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1950 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1993 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |