USPTO serial 74174380
ELISE D-E-S-I-G-N-S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELISE D-E-S-I-G-N-S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C WRAYSTE 3001493 CHAIN BRIDGE RDMCLEAN, VA 22101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | women's clothing; namely, upscale, hand painted and sequined jackets and shirts | ABANDONED | May 3, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |