Drawing for TEX MEX

USPTO serial 74174463

TEX MEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEX MEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard O. Bartz

RICHARD O BARTZ BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MNUNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030tortilla chipsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 28, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 6, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance