USPTO serial 74174936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Boutell
DAVID G BOUTELL FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | educational materials; namely, prerecorded audio and video cassette tapes, laser disks, film and photographic slide transparencies all featuring educational material; computer software for use in the educational field and video equipment; namely, video cameras, camera tripods, blank video cassettes and video cassette recorders | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed educational materials pertaining to a wide variety of school subjects and topics | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting programs to assist people in learning English as a second or foreign language | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |