USPTO serial 74176936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 3C2, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 3C2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Arrett
RICHARD A ARRETT VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS PA1540 MINNEAPOLIS CTR920 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4014| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | optician services | ABANDONED | Jan 9, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1994 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |