USPTO serial 74178047
LASEREYE CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 1996
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LASEREYE CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
CORNEAL CONSULTANTS OF INDIANA, P.C.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Other trademarks owned by CORNEAL CONSULTANTS OF INDIANA, P.C.
Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
SAN JOSE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent O. Wagner
Vincent O. Wagner Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | medical ophthalmological services | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRAIG S. BINDI, M.D., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
- Other trademarks owned by CORNEAL CONSULTANTS OF INDIANA, P.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Corneal Consultants of Indiana P.C.
- Other trademarks owned by GARY M. KAWISCH, M.D., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LASEREYE CENTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |