USPTO serial 74178616
ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Q. TODD DICKINSON
Q TODD DICKINSON SUN COMPANY, INCLAW DEPT - 17/10PC1801 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-1699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | gasoline, motor oil, automotive grease, general purpose grease, machine grease and gear oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |