USPTO serial 74178963
COCO LOTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1903263Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COCO LOTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bankok 10120, TH
Bankok 10120, TH
Bankok 10120, TH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Prince
DAVID L PRINCE1912 E VERNON AVE STE 100LOS ANGELES, CA 90058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed foods; namely, canned fruit, canned vegetables, frozen and canned coconut milk, dried, dehydrated and desiccated coconut, coconut cream, canned sardines, canned tuna, canned mackerel, dried shrimp, dried fish, dried cuttle fish, frozen seafood, fish cakes, frozen vegetables, vegetable based food beverages, and coconut powder | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1994 |
| 030 | staple foods; namely, dried and dehydrated coconut extract powder used as food flavoring, frozen snack foods; namely, spring rolls, dimsum, and shrimp dumpling, buns, ice cream, canned fruit extract used as a food flavoring, canned vegetable extract used as a food flavoring, coconut extract used as a food flavoring, dairy based fruit shake, dairy based vegetable shake, and dairy based coconut shake | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1994 |
| 032 | beverages; namely, fruit juice, fruit drinks, vegetable juice, coconut juice, coconut juice with pulp, coconut drink, coconut water, and coconut drink concentrates | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jantarach, Soyphet
- Other trademarks owned by Jantarach, Soyphet
- Other trademarks owned by Jantarach, Soyphet
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named COCO LOTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 4, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |