Drawing for LOCAL MOTION

USPTO serial 74178970

LOCAL MOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOCAL MOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest I. Gifford

ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALSTE 400280 N WOODWARD AVEBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012bicycles, and structural parts thereof; bicycle frame pads; bicycle shoulder rests; saddle bags, frame bags for use on bicycle framesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 26, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 1993DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 1993DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance