USPTO serial 74179445
VANTRIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VANTRIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H. BEGLER
JAY H BEGLER C/O LIFFY SULLIVAN GALWAY BEGLER& PEROFF PC41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals; namely, drugs for treating arthritis, cardiovascular injury and bowel disease | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | WRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |