USPTO serial 74179605
AUTOBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Rosa, CA
Santa Rosa, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, pants and headwear | ABANDONED | Jul 25, 1993 |
| 028 | board games and game equipment sold as a unit for playing soccer and other field games | ABANDONED | Jun 10, 1991 |
| 042 | distributorship services in the field of clothing and game equipment | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dechant, Edmund
- Other trademarks owned by Dechant, Edmund
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AUTOBALL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |