Drawing for STYLE-MARK

USPTO serial 74180014

STYLE-MARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLE-MARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregg W. Emch

GREGG W EMCH EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB & PORCELLO COSTE 1980, ONE SEAGATEP O BOX 916TOLEDO, OH 43692-0916

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019formed architectural millwork exclusive of cabinetry made of urethaneABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1993ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 17, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance