USPTO serial 74180081
EMERALD FOREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERALD FOREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES5300 SEQUOIA NW STE 200ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics; namely, eye liner, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, eyebrow pencil, lipstick, lip gloss, foundation, face powder, blusher; sun block, bath gel, shower gel, hair gel, skin soap, perfume, toiletries, essential oils, herbs and herbal extracts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |