Drawing for THE ARCHITECT SERIES

USPTO serial 74180176

THE ARCHITECT SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ARCHITECT SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce W. McKee

FELICIA J BOYD FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WELLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019non-metal windows and non-metal doorsABANDONEDJan 4, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 1996PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Feb 15, 1996PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 1995PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Mar 17, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 1995PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 9, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 12, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 2, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 1993ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 20, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance