USPTO serial 74180176
THE ARCHITECT SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ARCHITECT SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
FELICIA J BOYD FAEGRE & BENSON LLP2200 WELLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal windows and non-metal doors | ABANDONED | Jan 4, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |