USPTO serial 74180510
FIRST BOSTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRST BOSTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret K. Pfeiffer
MARGARET K PFEIFFER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | investment banking services, financial advisory services, and investment advisory services and broker-dealer services in the field of securities | ABANDONED | Jan 4, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |