USPTO serial 74180561
ROOT ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROOT ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ilkley, W. Yorkshire, LS29 9JD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL LASKY MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | sewage and industrial effluent treatment plants; waste water purification units; filters; and parts and fittings therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | industrial research and surveying relating to effluents, industrial effluent sludge treatment, leachates, water treatment, water supply or water distribution, sewage sludge treatment, sewage treatment or sewage disposal; industrial design and development services in the field of water and sewage treatment, sewage sludge treatment, effluent treatment, treatment of leachates, industrial effluent sludge treatment, or water main or sewerage renovation; consultation services in the field of effluent treatment, the treatment of leachates, water treatment or supply, sewage sludge treatment, sewage treatment or disposal, industrial effluent sludge treatment, and sewage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |