USPTO serial 74180891
BALTIMORE BAGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 1993
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALTIMORE BAGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta L. Horton
ROBERTA L HORTON ARNOLD & PORTER1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bagels; bagel sandwiches consisting primarily of bagels and then tuna, chicken and Dijon mustard, various cheeses, raisin/walnut spread, chive spread, vegetable spread, lox, corned beef, roast beef, turkey, salami, and pizza sauce and cheese and Italian herbs; and delicatessen products; namely, bakery goods, bagel chips and bagel crackers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |