USPTO serial 74181539
ACCESSORY NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCESSORY NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Gilman
MICHAEL R GILMAN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | umbrellas, wallets, cosmetic bags sold empty, travel bags, tote bags, backpacks, knapsacks, bags used for carrying camping gear, belt bags, roll bags, school bags, handbags, gymbags, attache cases and briefcases | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GITANO LICENSING, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCESSORY NETWORK GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GITANO LICENSING, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named ACCESSORY NETWORK
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |