Drawing for TILDA BASMATI RICE WATERED BY THE SNOW FED RIVERS OF THE HIMALAYAS

USPTO serial 74181676

TILDA BASMATI RICE WATERED BY THE SNOW FED RIVERS OF THE HIMALAYAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1790557Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 31, 1993
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
TMEO LAW OFFICE 13

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TILDA BASMATI RICE WATERED BY THE SNOW FED RIVERS OF THE HIMALAYAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise Seldman Benun, Esq.

Denise Seldman Benun, Esq. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.1111 Marcus AvenueLake Success, NY 11042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030riceSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 27, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 24, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 14, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 14, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 25, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Sep 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 1999C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 31, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 8, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance