USPTO serial 74182977
OPUS MAGNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPUS MAGNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip G. Kiely
PHILIP G KIELY POLAROID CORPORATION549 TECHNOLOGY SQCAMBRIDGE, MA 02139UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medical laboratory immunoassay reagents and reagents for use as controls and in calibration for use in biological fluid analysis and assay modules containing immunoassay reagents | ABANDONED | Nov 18, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PB DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PB DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BEHRING DIAGNOSTICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named OPUS MAGNUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1995 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |