Drawing for EDNA VALLEY VINEYARD

USPTO serial 74184040

EDNA VALLEY VINEYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1838056Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 1994
Examiner
—
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDNA VALLEY VINEYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Veronica Colby Devitt

VERONICA COLBY DEVITT THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLPPO BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 30, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 21, 200489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 5, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 12, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 31, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Jun 12, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance