USPTO serial 74184115
INTERCEPTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1993
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERCEPTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Germantown, MD
Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Germantown, MD
Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Germantown, MD
Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY V. LUPO
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT, FOX, KINTNER, PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLL1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multiplexing and demultiplexing test instruments designed for performance testing and monitoring of CCITT-based communications systems and equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Telecommunications Techniques Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTERCEPTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |