USPTO serial 74184488
ERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHATTORNEYS AT LAW301 N WASHINGTON STFALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-3487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | environmental sciences including assessing potential environmental problems in proposed projects as well a devising solutions to problems in existing projects through field investigations, hydrological studies and air and water quality monitoring, detecting and analyzing hazardous materials, toxic wastes and other substances in air, water or soil samples, assisting individuals in securing regulatory permits, implementing environmentally sound programs and monitoring compliance of remediation projects; engineering and design including environmental and infrastructure engineering, including providing design services to commercial and municipal clients, designing handling, storage, treatment of disposal facilities for a wide variety of hazardous and domestic waste, designing municipal waste and storage facilities and landfills, industrial waste treatment facilities, mine and utility waste management facilities and underground storage tank evaluations, and infrastructure engineering and design of highways, tunnels, bridges, railroad and airport design as well as storm water management; energy including designing, implementing and evaluating energy conservation and demand projects, analyzing and licensing support, developing and implementing quality assurance programs and performing safety system functional inspections; providing support in policy, planning and programming, nuclear safety and risk assessments, physical security evaluations, and emergency and nuclear waste planning for domestic and international government agencies | ABANDONED | Apr 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |