USPTO serial 74185534
SOFTCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Polumbus, Esq.
GARY M COLUMBUS ESQ HOLLAND AND HART555 17TH ST STE 2900P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | window coverings; namely, shades and blinds and non-metal clips, non-metal brackets, non-metal handles for curtains, curtain rails, non-metal clamps, non-metal hooks, plastic knobs and non-metal curtain rings, non-metal end caps for windows, blinds and doors, window blind tracks and supports | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |