USPTO serial 74186089
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 6PS, GB
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 6PS, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Avital (Tally) Eitan
AVITAL (TALLY) EITAN SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSONFRANKLIN & FRIEL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | exercise machines, rowing machines, step-up machines, bench press machines, cycling machines, and exercise toning tables | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |