Drawing for SHAPEMASTER

USPTO serial 74186089

SHAPEMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SHAPEMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Avital (Tally) Eitan

AVITAL (TALLY) EITAN SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSONFRANKLIN & FRIEL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028exercise machines, rowing machines, step-up machines, bench press machines, cycling machines, and exercise toning tablesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 1997ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 3, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 3, 1997OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 19951.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 12, 1995IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 24, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 17, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance